POINTS SYSTEM IS PERFECT BASIS FOR ALL-PARTY COALITION
So now what happens? Is Friday's open and transparent election to be followed, yet again, by closed and opaque discussions, as the TDs decide (amongst themselves) who is to govern. In 2016, it took 70 days. In Belgium in 2010/11, over 500. Anything to concoct a majority.
But majority rule is based on majority voting, the most primitive voting procedure ever invented. There are other methodologies: plurality voting, as in the Danish Folketing; two-round voting, as in New Zealand’s five-option referendum of 1992; the single transferable vote, STV without PR, as in Ireland’s presidential elections; and so on.
The most accurate is probably a points system. On any controversy in a five-party parliament, there could be five options ‘on the table’. When the TDs vote:
+ he who casts only one preference gets his favourite 1 point;
+ she who casts two prefs gets her favourite 2 points (and her 2nd choice 1 point);
and so on; so
+ those who cast all five prefs get their favourite 5 points, (their 2nd choice 4, etc.).
At best, the winner is the option with the most points or the highest average preference; and an average involves (not just a majority) but every TD. It is thus the perfect basis for an all-party power-sharing coalition. Democracy, after all, is for everybody, not just Trump, or Netanyahu, or Bolsonaro etc., etc..